Fresh tensions have emerged within the African Democratic Congress following criticism of the party’s decision to select former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi as the running mate to presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar for the 2027 election.
The latest disagreement was triggered by comments from Kenneth Okonkwo, a prominent member of the party, who expressed dissatisfaction with the choice of Amaechi for the vice-presidential position.
Okonkwo argued that the selection of another candidate from the South-South region could further reinforce perceptions of political exclusion in the South-East.
According to him, the South-East has neither produced a president nor a vice president since Nigeria’s return to democratic rule in 1999, making the region deserving of greater consideration in national political arrangements.
His comments came shortly after the ADC officially announced Amaechi as Atiku’s running mate, describing the partnership as a “unity and rescue ticket” ahead of the 2027 presidential election.
The party stated that Amaechi’s selection followed consultations with stakeholders across various geopolitical zones and reflected his performance during the ADC presidential primary where he emerged runner-up to Atiku.
Party leaders also highlighted Amaechi’s experience as a former Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, two-term governor, and former Minister of Transportation as factors that influenced the decision.
Despite these explanations, Okonkwo maintained that the South-East had made significant sacrifices for the opposition coalition and deserved stronger representation at the highest levels of leadership.
He pointed to the role played by former ADC National Chairman Ralph Nwosu and other South-East stakeholders in supporting coalition-building efforts within the party.
According to Okonkwo, denying the region both the presidential and vice-presidential slots could be interpreted as continuing a pattern of political marginalisation.
The politician disclosed that he had previously urged Atiku to demonstrate commitment to South-East inclusion by selecting a running mate from the region.
He argued that such a move would have strengthened confidence among supporters who believe the region deserves a greater role in national leadership.
Okonkwo further stated that he would find it difficult to campaign enthusiastically for a presidential ticket that excludes the South-East from both top positions.
The development highlights the delicate balancing act political parties face when constructing nationally acceptable tickets in a country with strong regional and ethnic considerations.
Political analysts note that vice-presidential selections often carry strategic significance beyond individual qualifications because they can influence perceptions of inclusion and representation.
The ADC, however, has defended its decision and insists that the Atiku-Amaechi partnership offers a combination of experience, political reach, and governance expertise capable of attracting support across the country.
Party officials believe Amaechi’s influence in the South-South and his long record in public service will strengthen the ticket’s national appeal ahead of the election.
Observers say the disagreement underscores broader debates within opposition politics regarding regional balance and power-sharing arrangements.
While the ADC leadership appears determined to move forward with the ticket, the reaction from Okonkwo suggests that discussions over representation and political inclusion are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.
With preparations for the 2027 election already gathering momentum, the party may face increasing pressure to maintain unity while addressing concerns raised by influential stakeholders from different parts of the country.