A support group loyal to former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi has launched a sharp response to former Borno State Governor Ali Modu Sheriff over recent comments on patriotism, escalating the war of words between supporters of key political figures ahead of the 2027 general election.
In a statement, the group accused Sheriff of lacking the moral authority to lecture Nigerians on patriotism, arguing that his political history remains a subject of public debate. The organisation also used the phrase "godfather of terrorism" while criticising the former governor, a characterisation that reflects the group's opinion and not an established fact.
The exchange follows comments reportedly made by Sheriff in which he criticised Peter Obi and questioned his approach to national issues.
Responding to those remarks, the Obi support group defended the former Anambra State governor, describing him as a politician whose public image has been built around accountability, prudent management of public resources and advocacy for good governance.
The group maintained that Obi's calls for transparency, fiscal discipline and responsible leadership have resonated with many Nigerians, particularly young voters seeking reforms in governance and public administration.
It argued that political disagreements should focus on policies and national development rather than personal attacks, while insisting that Nigerians are capable of assessing the records of public office holders independently.
The support group further alleged that Sheriff was not in a position to question Obi's patriotism because of controversies that have surrounded his political career over the years.
However, it did not present new evidence to support its assertions beyond references to past public debates.
Ali Modu Sheriff has repeatedly denied allegations linking him to terrorism and has never been convicted by any court of law on terrorism-related offences. Nigerian authorities have also not secured any criminal conviction against the former governor on such allegations.
Political observers say the latest exchange reflects the increasingly heated political atmosphere as parties and interest groups begin positioning ahead of the next general election.
With more than a year before Nigerians return to the polls, supporters of major political figures have continued to engage in public debates over governance, economic policy and leadership credentials.
Analysts note that while robust political criticism is a normal feature of democracy, public discourse is strengthened when arguments are based on verifiable facts rather than inflammatory language.
Across Nigeria, citizens continue to demand issue-based campaigns centred on economic recovery, security, infrastructure, job creation and the rising cost of living.
Many voters have urged political leaders and their supporters to focus on presenting practical solutions to the country's pressing challenges instead of exchanging personal accusations.
The latest development underscores the growing intensity of political communication as parties prepare for what is expected to be a fiercely contested 2027 election.
The exchange highlights the increasingly competitive nature of Nigeria's political environment as preparations for the 2027 elections gather momentum.
It also underscores the importance of responsible political communication, particularly when allegations concern matters of public interest. Democratic debate is strengthened when disagreements focus on policies, governance and verifiable facts while respecting the principles of fairness and the rule of law.
For Nigerians, the quality of political discourse will remain an important factor in shaping public confidence and informed electoral choices.
A Peter Obi support group has strongly criticised Ali Modu Sheriff over comments on patriotism, arguing that he lacks the moral authority to make such remarks. While the verbal exchange reflects rising political tensions ahead of the 2027 elections, observers continue to call for issue-based engagement and respectful democratic debate grounded in facts.