A dismissed Nigerian soldier, Rotimi Olamilekan, has reignited a national conversation on military welfare after releasing what he claims are payment records and openly challenging the Nigerian Army to make its payroll public.
In a follow-up video shared online, Olamilekan popularly known as Soja Boi—displayed bank transaction alerts which he says reflect his earnings during active service. The move comes shortly after the Nigerian Army dismissed his earlier claims about poor welfare as false and misleading.
According to him, his monthly salary stood at ₦112,061.59. He also outlined additional allowances, including a ₦20,000 “grumbling allowance,” a ₦45,000 operational allowance for soldiers deployed to conflict zones such as Maiduguri, and a ₦6,000 security allowance. He noted that these extra payments are not consistent, as only actively deployed personnel receive them, meaning many soldiers reportedly rely mainly on base salary and limited allowances.
“I am not trying to damage the image of the Nigerian Army. I am simply stating facts and backing them with evidence,” he said, while challenging authorities to publicly release payroll records if his claims are incorrect.
The controversy began after an earlier interview on the Honest Brunch Podcast, where Olamilekan raised concerns about the welfare of Nigerian soldiers. He alleged that personnel are sometimes required to purchase essential items such as uniforms and boots themselves, citing costs that could run into tens of thousands of naira. He also claimed that access to protective gear like bulletproof vests and helmets can be inconsistent.
Responding, the Nigerian Army, through its spokesperson, maintained that all personnel are adequately equipped and that uniforms, kits, and protective gear are provided through official channels. The Army also stated that salaries and allowances are paid directly and consistently, describing Olamilekan’s claims as inaccurate.
Officials further clarified that his dismissal was due to disciplinary issues, including violations of military social media policies and unauthorised public appearances, and not directly related to his comments on welfare.
Olamilekan, however, insists his dismissal followed a separate viral video in which he urged politicians to allow their children serve as regular soldiers rather than officers. The video sparked the #FreeSojaBoi campaign across social media platforms.
It is important to note that the payment receipts presented by Olamilekan have not been independently verified, and the Nigerian Army has not publicly responded to his latest challenge regarding payroll transparency.
Beyond the individual dispute, the situation has sparked wider public debate about the welfare, pay structure, and working conditions of Nigerian soldiers. For many observers, the issue raises broader questions about transparency, accountability, and support for personnel involved in national security operations.
As conversations continue, the situation highlights the growing demand for clarity and trust between institutions and the public, particularly on issues affecting those on the front lines of national service.